Basic Information
Well, since this is my last blog post, I
guess it’s only fitting that I come full circle and read a play by the first playwright we discussed
in class. Alice Gerstenberg’s Fourteen
was originally published in Drama
Magazine in 1920. (Theatre History Website) I was unable to find a ton of information concerning
productions. However, I do know that Fourteen
was performed at the One Act Play Festival in 2011 in Elliot Lake, Ontario,
Canada. (Elliot Lake News) This play was also presented in a series of six short plays by and
about women in 2007 in the East Village, New York. (New York Times) I was able to access this
play through the North America Women’s Drama Database.
Basic Plot
Fourteen features three characters: Mrs.
Pringle, a fashionable matron; Elaine, her daughter, a debutante; and Dunham,
the maid or butler. The entirety of this play takes place immediately before
Mrs. Pringle’s dinner party. The number of guests is originally to be fourteen.
However, because of a blizzard, the guests cancel continually, and the
characters scramble to adjust the seating arrangements. First, the characters
attempt to add or eliminate guests in order to avoid having thirteen at a
table. As more guests confirm or cancel, other concerns arise. For example, the
family adjusts the numbers so that the father can sit at the head of the table.
In addition, Mrs. Pringle has invited one of the guests, the wealthy Oliver
Farnsworth, to dine in the hopes that he will marry Elaine. As the chaos
builds, Farnsworth cancels, causing Mrs. Pringle to denounce him and social
life. At the height of her mania, it turns out that Farnsworth has sent the
Prince of Wales and his bodyguard to dine in his stead. As a result, the number
is back to fourteen, and an elated Mrs. Pringle hopes to marry Elaine off to
the Prince.
Dramaturgical Choice #1: Duration
One significant dramaturgical choice pertains
to duration. Gerstenberg chooses to assign all the stage time to the
preparation for the party instead of the party itself. At first, this seems
like an odd choice, considering how much Mrs. Pringle builds up the dinner.
However, I think Gerstenberg assigns the stage time to the preparations in
order to show the intricate details attached to social life. These details,
while seeming inconsequential, hold enormous weight for the characters. For
example, the characters work themselves into a frenzy in order to avoid the
number thirteen or to allow the father to sit at the head of the table.
Mrs. Pringle ignores all else in an attempt
to maintain the etiquette of high society. She places Elaine’s (and, therefore,
her own) social position above all else. Mrs. Pringle goes to great lengths to
ensure that Elaine will sit beside Oliver Farnsworth. When Elaine says that it
is useless to sit next to him, her mother says, “Aren’t you going to try to
make a good match for yourself? I fling every eligible man I can at your head.
Can’t you finish the rest yourself?” Gerstenberg spends so much time on the
details, exposing their ridiculous intricacies, that determine Mrs. Pringle’s
social position.
Dramaturgical Choice #2:
Progression
Gerstenberg also makes a dramaturgical choice
pertaining to progression. Namely, Gerstenberg foreshadows the Prince’s arrival
by discussing him earlier in the script. When Mrs. Pringle and Elaine discuss
Oliver Farnsworth, Elaine says that he intimidates her as much as would the
Prince of Wales. Mrs. Pringle then says, “The Prince of Wales! Oh! What
wouldn’t I give to have the Prince of Wales in my house! New York has lost its
heart to him. I was just telling Mr. Farnsworth yesterday that I’d give
anything to have the Prince here. I would establish my social position for
life!” The prospect of the Prince's arrival is dismissed as an improbable fantasy.
I think that Gerstenberg foreshadows the
Prince’s arrival in order to indicate that there will always be a chance to
climb higher on the social ladder. When the Prince of Wales is first mentioned,
he is an unattainable hypothetical, representing the hopes for extremely high
social position. Before the Prince arrives, Mrs. Pringle has become so
frustrated that she forswears the intricacies of social life. However, when the
Prince actually goes to Mrs. Pringle’s house, his arrival snaps the matron out
of her mood. As a result, her mind immediately turns to social climbing.
I have read this play before and I think that Mrs. Pringle cares too much about her social status. She does spend the whole play trying to make things just right so that her guest will be satisfied as well as making herself not seem like a bad host. And why is it that the whole plot is just the preparation and nothing else? Everything seems to end up how she wants it to be, and it seems as if she stressed herself out for nothing.
ReplyDeleteMarvellous play..so hysterical yet real. I would love to be able to play as Mrs Pringle..
ReplyDelete